Airffic Inspection无人机巡检未来指南

PAPER P22 · 2018

Application of Crack Identification Techniques for an Aging Concrete Bridge Inspection Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Kim, I.-H., Jeon, H., Baek, S.-C., Hong, W.-H., Jung, H.-J. — Sensors 18(6):1881

已读全文 引用次数: openalex: 275 (2026-10-22)

在一座老化混凝土桥上测试一套流程,从商用无人机拍摄的照片中检测裂缝并测量其宽度和长度。裂缝由在小规模训练集上微调的 R-CNN 检测,贴在结构上的 70 mm 方形标记提供像素比例尺,并用单应变换校正畸变。由于桥下 GPS 不可靠,飞行以约 2 m 距离手动进行。现场共测量了 12 条裂缝,但未在现场进行真值核对。

主要发现

  • Lab test relative error about 1-2% for crack quantification
  • Field: 12 cracks measured at about 0.53-2.47 mm thick and 6.6-78.4 mm long
  • Processing about 150 min for the point cloud and about 14 min for deep-learning detection

局限

  • Field measurements not checked against ground truth; no precision/recall reported
  • Requires a physical marker on the structure for scale
  • Manual flight; GPS unreliable under the bridge
  • One bridge, only the rails inspected; small training set (384 images)

来源