Airffic InspectionThe future guide to drone inspection

PAPER P22 · 2018

Application of Crack Identification Techniques for an Aging Concrete Bridge Inspection Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Kim, I.-H., Jeon, H., Baek, S.-C., Hong, W.-H., Jung, H.-J. — Sensors 18(6):1881

Full text read Citations: openalex: 275 (2026-10-22)

Tests a pipeline on an ageing concrete bridge that detects cracks in photos from a commercial drone and measures their width and length. Cracks were detected with an R-CNN fine-tuned on a small training set, and a 70 mm square marker attached to the structure gave the pixel scale, with homography correcting distortion. Flights were manual at about 2 m because GPS was unreliable under the bridge. Twelve field cracks were sized, but without ground-truth checks on site.

Key findings

  • Lab test relative error about 1-2% for crack quantification
  • Field: 12 cracks measured at about 0.53-2.47 mm thick and 6.6-78.4 mm long
  • Processing about 150 min for the point cloud and about 14 min for deep-learning detection

Limitations

  • Field measurements not checked against ground truth; no precision/recall reported
  • Requires a physical marker on the structure for scale
  • Manual flight; GPS unreliable under the bridge
  • One bridge, only the rails inspected; small training set (384 images)

Sources