ASSET / SHIP
Ship & offshore inspection: seeing inside dark steel boxes without staging
Ballast tanks, cargo holds, cargo tanks, flare stacks: ship surveys have demanded getting within arm’s reach inside dark steel boxes tens of metres tall. This guide looks at how much of that work — long carried by staging, rafts and human bodies — drones can take on within the classification societies’ framework for remote inspection techniques (RIT).
On this page
Where ships start to deteriorate
A hull is a collection of huge boxes made of steel plates and stiffeners — longitudinals, transverses, frames and brackets — welded together. The main drivers of deterioration are corrosion from seawater and cargo, fatigue cracking from repeated wave loads, and deformation from cargo operations and berthing. Ballast tanks in particular are damp, dark spaces repeatedly filled with seawater; once the coating fails, corrosion accelerates.
| Element | Typical defects | If missed |
|---|---|---|
| Ballast tanks | Coating breakdown, general, pitting and grooving corrosion | Thickness loss, insufficient strength, flooding |
| Bracket toes & hopper knuckles | Fatigue cracks at stress concentrations | Crack growth, structural fracture |
| Bulk carrier cargo holds (side frames) | Cargo-handling damage, frames wasted or detached by corrosion | Side-shell damage and catastrophic hull failure |
| Oil tanker cargo tanks | Bottom pitting, corrosion around heating coils | Cargo leakage, pollution |
| Deck & hatch covers | Corrosion, loss of weathertightness | Water ingress, cargo damage |
| Bottom shell, rudder & propeller | Coating loss, corrosion, fouling, damage | Higher fuel use, effects on manoeuvring |
| Offshore structures (jackets, FPSOs, flares) | Splash-zone corrosion, flare-tip damage, mooring-chain wear | Production shutdown, structural damage |
Today’s inspection and its pain points
Seagoing ships keep their class by passing surveys by a classification society (for example ClassNK, DNV, ABS or Lloyd’s Register). The basic cycle is annual surveys, an intermediate survey, and a renewal (special) survey every five years. In Japan, ships classed by a classification society registered with the government (e.g. ClassNK) are deemed to have passed the corresponding government inspections under the Ship Safety Act.
Especially demanding is the Enhanced Survey Programme (ESP) for bulk carriers and oil tankers. Under IMO’s 2011 ESP Code and IACS unified requirements, the extent of close-up survey and thickness measurement grows with ship age. A close-up survey means the surveyor examines structural details normally within reach of hand — including the upper parts of tall tanks.
| Access method | Strength | Pain point |
|---|---|---|
| Staging (scaffolding) | Reliable reach; thickness can be measured | Days to erect and dismantle, cost, longer dry-dock time |
| Rafting (raise water level, use a boat) | Reaches upper areas without staging | Filling the tank, risk of capsize or entrapment, depends on weather and ship motion |
| Rope access | Where staging is impractical | Few qualified technicians, fall risk |
| Cherry picker (in dock) | Fast inside cargo holds | Only some ships and holds |
| Divers (in-water survey) | Inspect the bottom without dry-docking | Diving risk, turbidity, time limits |
Then there is the danger of enclosed spaces. Tanks can lack oxygen or hold residual cargo gases. IMO’s recommendations for entering enclosed spaces require ventilation, gas testing and attendants, yet accidents continue. Reducing the number of entries itself is the drone’s greatest value.
What drones change
Inside ships, most drones are collision-tolerant caged aircraft. In narrow tanks crowded with stiffeners they keep flying after bumping into structure and capture images under their own lighting. Outside, standard multirotors cover the hull, hatch covers, and offshore flares and jackets.
| Approach | Typical platforms & sensors | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Close-range imaging in tanks & holds | Caged drones with lighting and LiDAR (e.g. Flyability Elios 3) | Ballast tanks, cargo tanks, upper cargo holds |
| Thickness measurement | Drones that press an ultrasonic probe to the steel | Supporting class thickness measurement (within an approved firm’s procedures) |
| Hull exterior & deck | Multirotor with high-res camera | Shell deformation and coating, hatch covers, superstructure |
| Underwater hull | Tethered ROVs, hull-crawling robots | Bottom, rudder, propeller, sea chests (in-water survey in lieu of dry-docking) |
| Offshore topsides | Multirotor with zoom and thermal | Flare stacks in operation, jacket tops, cranes |
| Offshore subsea | ROVs, AUVs | Jacket welds, mooring chains, subsea pipelines |
Classification societies and remote inspection techniques (RIT)
IACS calls drones, ROVs and similar means of replacing close-up access remote inspection techniques (RIT) and publishes guidelines for their use (IACS Recommendation No. 42). The core idea: RIT does not replace the surveyor’s judgement — it is a means for the surveyor to see the structure. It counts as close-up survey only when the surveyor is satisfied the imagery shows condition to the same degree.
- Approved service suppliers: firms providing RIT are approved by the classification society as service suppliers. The procedural requirements for service suppliers are set out in IACS Unified Requirement UR Z17, which also covers thickness-measurement firms.
- Surveyor attendance: as a rule the surveyor is on site and examines the structure through real-time video.
- Image quality and location: adequate lighting, resolution and stable imagery are required, and it must be clear which member is being viewed.
- When in doubt, a person goes close: if the imagery reveals defects or is inconclusive, conventional close-up access follows.
- Each society’s guidance: DNV, ABS and other societies publish their own guidance and approval procedures for RIT and drones. The details differ, so confirm with the attending class society first.
Overcoming the environment
A ship’s tank is among the most hostile places a drone can fly. No GNSS at all, a compass made useless by surrounding steel, total darkness, and narrow spaces full of stiffeners. Radio bounces off steel walls and may not reach beyond the next manhole.
- Confined spaces: choose caged aircraft that hold attitude after a collision. The manhole size decides which aircraft can enter. Confined spaces
- Darkness: onboard lighting is the only light. Rust dust stirred up by propellers can wash out images. Darkness
- GNSS-denied: use aircraft that localise visually or with LiDAR and can record which member in which compartment was imaged. GNSS-denied
- Magnetic disturbance: inside a steel box the compass cannot be trusted; fly in modes that do not depend on it. Magnetic disturbance
- Water, spray & humidity: freshly deballasted tanks are humid with water left at the bottom; outside there are waves and spray. Water, spray & humidity
- Wind & turbulence: shell plating at sea and flare stacks are windy, and air swirls above the deck. Wind & turbulence
Cargo tanks add one more barrier: flammable gas and oxygen deficiency. Typical inspection drones are not certified for explosive atmospheres, so tanks must be gas-freed and confirmed safe by measurement before flying. Even without a person entering, this step cannot be skipped. See also explosive atmospheres and oxygen deficiency & toxic gas.
From images to decisions
Ship survey findings are recorded as coating condition, presence of substantial corrosion (wastage beyond 75% of the allowable margin), and any cracks or deformation; repairs are decided from these. Drone imagery helps in the steps before that: finding, locating and comparing with last time.
| Step | What machines do | What people own |
|---|---|---|
| Detection | Propose coating breakdown, rust and cracks from video | Check misses and false alarms |
| Measurement | Estimate rust coverage and deformation (LiDAR point clouds) | Confirm scale and capture conditions |
| Localisation | Link footage to compartment and frame number; place on a 3D model | Match to members on drawings |
| Thickness | Record contact-probe readings with position | Measurement and reporting by an approved firm |
| Rating | — | Surveyor’s acceptance as close-up survey, repair decisions, maintaining class |
Ships revisit the same tanks the same way every five years. Tie video and point clouds to compartment and frame numbers, and the next renewal survey can go straight to what changed. That is the most practical use of a digital twin.
Rules and responsibility
The framework comes from SOLAS and the ESP Code (IMO) and, under them, classification society rules and IACS unified requirements. Whether a drone can serve for close-up survey is governed by each society’s RIT guidance and its approved service supplier procedures, and ultimately the attending surveyor decides. For ESP ships, some societies also require the flag administration to accept RIT. Owners and managers agree the survey plan with class in advance, specifying where and how drones will be used.
For flying, the inside of a tank or hold is an indoor space and falls outside Japan’s aviation flight rules. But flights over the deck or around the hull are subject to aviation law, and in port you also need permission from the port authority, facility security officer and shipyard. Offshore, the operator’s safety rules and the coastal state’s regulations apply. Compare countries in world regulations.
What drones cannot do
- Skipping gas-freeing: even without people inside, a non-certified drone cannot fly in a tank with flammable gas. Ventilation, testing and permits remain.
- Under mud and rust scale: sediment on the bottom or thick scale hides the steel. Clean first.
- All thickness measurement: contact-sensing drones are improving, but taking every required reading by drone is not yet common practice.
- Confirming cracks: a suspicious line on video must be confirmed by close access or NDT to establish whether it is a crack and how far it extends.
- Rating and class: accepting the survey as close-up, requiring repairs and maintaining class are decisions for the surveyor and the society.
2035: the world where inspection works
On the voyage before dry-docking, the crew opens a tank manhole and completes ventilation and gas testing. A drone carried on board flies the tank on its own. Its video and point cloud are overlaid on the 3D model from the last renewal survey, and only the changed areas reach the shore-based surveyor and the ship manager.
By the time the ship enters dock, it is already settled where staging goes and which plates will be renewed. Surveyors enter only where the drone has found something, and only when they must. Collapses in tanks become a thing of the past — that, at least, is how the editors see it.
PREPARATION
Pre-flight preparation checklist
Ticks are saved on this device (and to your shared account if signed in). This is a learning aid, not proof of permission or safety.
Cases for this asset
Country sources(17)
- Research on drone technology for marine inspections (FY2019 report)JP · 日本海事協会ほか(国交省 交通運輸技術開発推進制度)
- ClassNK publishes guidelines for use of drones in class surveysJP · IIMS(International Institute of Marine Surveying)
- Diving into deep tech: How Indian startups are securing the underwater foundations of tradeIN · The Week
- MPA Singapore conducted trial for the inspection of ship tanks and holds using dronesSG · OpenGov Asia(シンガポール船籍登録 E-Bulletin に基づく)
- First in Indonesia, ITS Launches Air Emission Detection DroneID · Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember(ITS)
- Terra Drone obtains BKI certification for ship structure surveysID · Media Asuransi News
- BHP trials drones for port operationsAU · Australasian Mine Safety Journal
- Impact stories: Skygauge RoboticsCA · Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
- For the first time in Brazil, a drone is used for confined-space inspection on a Petrobras platformBR · Click Petróleo e Gás
- Bureau Veritas performs first drone surveyFR · SAFETY4SEA
- A first for RINA: first remote class inspection and survey of a ship using a droneIT · Shipping Italy
- Drone Port of Rotterdam: towards a hybrid portNL · Havenbedrijf Rotterdam (Port of Rotterdam Authority)
Check the evidence
Rules, figures and cases cite the sources below. Future scenarios and design proposals are the editors’ own view.
- IACS UR Z17 (Rev.16, 2021): Procedural requirements for service suppliers – relevant sectionsIACS (extract hosted by Indian Register of Shipping) · Full text read
- IMO Resolution A.1049(27): 2011 ESP CodeInternational Maritime Organization · Full text read
- ClassNKNippon Kaiji Kyokai · Full text read
- DNV: Survey by remote inspection techniques – use of approved service suppliers (2019)DNV · Full text read
- ABS: Guidance Notes on the Use of Remote Inspection Technologies (December 2022)American Bureau of Shipping · Full text read
Sources checked: 2026-10-22