ASSET / PORT
Port inspection: reading the waterline and the hidden side of quays between the tides
Pier deck soffits, the waterline on steel sheet piles, caisson joints, voids under the apron: ports deteriorate where tide and waves meet and underwater where nobody can see. This guide looks at how much of the work done by boats and divers can be shared among aerial, surface and underwater drones.
On this page
Where ports start to deteriorate
Port facilities divide into mooring facilities (quay walls, piers, dolphins), protective works (breakwaters, revetments) and cargo-handling and ancillary items (aprons, crane foundations, fenders, bollards). The main drivers are seawater corrosion of steel, chloride attack on concrete, wave and berthing impacts, and loss of fill behind the wall.
| Element | Typical defects | If missed |
|---|---|---|
| Sheet piles & steel pipe piles at the waterline | Corrosion in the tidal and splash zones; concentrated corrosion just below low water causing holes | Fill washing out behind the wall, loss of strength |
| Pier superstructure (deck & beam soffits) | Chloride-induced cracking, spalling, exposed rebar | Falling concrete, reduced capacity |
| Apron & backland | Settlement, sinkholes, pavement cracking | Collapse into voids left by fill loss, accidents with cargo vehicles |
| Caissons & breakwaters | Opening joints, displacement or tilting, scattered armour units | Storm damage, loss of calm water in the harbour |
| Fenders & bollards | Cracked or missing rubber, corroded fixings, loose bollards | Hull and quay damage on berthing, mooring-line accidents |
| Cathodic protection | Depleted anodes, reduced protection | Corrosion accelerating unnoticed |
Today’s inspection and its pain points
In Japan, under the technical standards for port facilities, each facility needs a maintenance plan and must be inspected and diagnosed according to it. The national inspection guidelines combine routine patrols with periodic inspections at least every five years (every three years for priority facilities), plus extraordinary inspections after earthquakes or storm waves.
Above water the work is done on foot and by boat; underwater it relies on divers. Under piers, inspectors slip in by small boat at low tide and look up by torchlight. Steel thickness is measured by divers who first scrape away shells and weed, then apply an ultrasonic gauge.
| Method | Strength | Pain point |
|---|---|---|
| Walking & visual | Spots defects on the apron and superstructure | Cannot see the waterline or under piers |
| Small boat | Reaches under piers and the quay face | At the mercy of tide and waves; cramped, dark, overhead hazards |
| Divers | Touch, clean and measure thickness | Few divers, limited bottom time and depth, turbidity, diving risk |
| Echo sounding from a vessel | Seabed profile and scour | Poor at fine detail on the wall face |
| Void detection (e.g. ground-penetrating radar) | Clues to voids under the apron | Slow to cover large areas |
At the root of the pain: quays built in the high-growth era are ageing all at once, and divers and port engineers are in short supply. Many berths cannot stop cargo handling, so inspection has to slot in between ship movements.
What drones change
Ports call for a combination of aerial, surface and underwater drones. Aerial drones cover the overview and superstructure, surface vessels the pier soffits and waterline, and underwater vehicles the wall face and seabed.
| Approach | Typical platforms & sensors | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Aerial overview & 3D | Multirotor with high-res camera and LiDAR | Apron settlement, breakwater and armour layout, post-disaster checks |
| Close-range under-pier imaging | Upward-gimbal, vision-positioned or caged drones | Cracks and spalls on deck and beam soffits |
| Uncrewed surface vessels (USV) | Small uncrewed boats with multibeam sonar and cameras | Seabed and scour in front of quays, imaging under piers |
| Underwater ROVs | Small tethered ROVs with camera, lights and sonar | Sheet pile and pile surfaces, caisson joints, anode condition |
| ROVs with contact sensors | Arms carrying ultrasonic gauges or potential probes | Thickness and protection potential (mostly trials or limited use) |
Overcoming the environment
Ports are hostile to every kind of drone. Under piers it is dark and GNSS-denied. Over the sea there is wind and swell. Underwater, turbidity and current can limit cameras to tens of centimetres.
- Water, spray & humidity: salt spray damages aircraft; water reflections fool downward sensors; in murky water sonar beats cameras. Water, spray & humidity
- GNSS-denied: under piers, choose aircraft that localise visually or with LiDAR. Underwater there is no GNSS, so manage position with acoustic positioning or tether length. GNSS-denied
- Darkness: it is dark under piers even at noon. Use lit aircraft and consistent exposure. Darkness
- Wind & turbulence: sea wind is unobstructed, and it swirls around quay corners and piers. Wind & turbulence
- Magnetic disturbance: sheet piles, cranes and moored hulls upset compasses. Magnetic disturbance
Another obstacle is ships. Working berths have large vessels and cranes, so when and where to launch a boat or ROV must be agreed with port operations.
From images to decisions
Port inspection rates each member’s degree of deterioration (in stages such as a–d), evaluates the performance of the facility as a whole and sets repair priorities. Drone data helps in the steps before rating: finding, measuring and comparing.
| Step | What machines do | What people own |
|---|---|---|
| Detection | Propose soffit cracks, rust stains, steel corrosion and holes | Check misses and false alarms; tell marine growth from defects |
| Measurement | Estimate settlement, scour and armour movement from 3D and bathymetry differences | Confirm tide correction and control points |
| Localisation | Link images to facility, member and depth | Match to member IDs |
| Change detection | Differences from previous data | Interpret rate and cause |
| Rating | — | Deterioration grades, performance, repair priority, usage restrictions |
Port data becomes comparable only with tide and depth attached. Tag photos with tide level, sonar with position, ROV video with depth and wall location. That small effort lets you answer, ten years on, which part has thinned and by how much.
Rules and responsibility
Responsibility for inspection lies with the port authority (usually a local government) or the facility owner. How drone and ROV data are used is for the manager to judge and record, within the technical standards and inspection guidelines. The national government also compiles information on new technologies for port inspection — see the MLIT Ports and Harbours Bureau.
For flying, Japan’s “specified flight” rules apply (over densely inhabited districts, within 30 m of people or property, etc.). Quay cranes and moored ships count as property. Most international ports have restricted areas under the SOLAS maritime security framework (the ISPS Code), so you cannot enter or fly without permission from the port authority and the facility security officer. Work on the water may also need procedures with the harbour master (Japan Coast Guard) because of vessel traffic. Compare countries in world regulations.
Internationally, PIANC, the World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure, brings together international experts to publish technical reports and guidance.
What drones cannot do
- Under marine growth: steel covered in shells and weed must be cleaned before its surface can be seen. Cleaning is still mostly divers’ work.
- Reliable thickness measurement: ROV-mounted gauges are improving, but cleaning, coupling and recording consistently is still often more reliable by hand.
- Visual inspection in murky water: heavy turbidity defeats cameras. Sonar shows shape but not fine cracks.
- Voids under the apron: invisible from above. Ground-penetrating radar or coring is needed.
- Rating and usage restrictions: deciding whether a berth can be used is the manager’s responsibility.
2035: the world where inspection works
In the early morning, with no ships moving, a small uncrewed boat slides out from the end of the quay and photographs the deck soffits as it threads under the pier. At the same time a tethered ROV descends along the sheet piles, recording the wall at the same depth and position as last time. An aerial drone measures the apron and spots a few millimetres of settlement.
Divers go down only at the few places the data flags. Port engineers compare deterioration rates across facilities and decide which quay to repair and when — that, at least, is how the editors see it.
PREPARATION
Pre-flight preparation checklist
Ticks are saved on this device (and to your shared account if signed in). This is a learning aid, not proof of permission or safety.
Cases for this asset
- MLIT Kanto Bureau: aerial and underwater drone trials for breakwater and pier inspection at Kawasaki PortKawasaki Port (Higashi-Ogishima breakwater), Kanagawa, Japan · 2023
- Puertos del Estado (Spain): first conference on drone use across the state port system, including lighthouse and infrastructure inspectionSpanish state-owned ports (conference at the Port Authority of Tarragona) · 2025
Country sources(40)
- Drones and AI for precise port facility inspection and inspector safetyKR · 보안뉴스
- Busan Port Authority uses drones in winter port safety checksKR · 아시아경제
- Industrial inspections cost companies millions, these Indian drones and ROVs startups can change thatIN · The News Minute
- How this Chennai-based startup is pioneering underwater AI-based ROVsIN · INDIAai (Government of India AI portal)
- Diving into deep tech: How Indian startups are securing the underwater foundations of tradeIN · The Week
- Underwater robotics startup Planys raises Rs 14 Cr; to focus on inspecting ageing infrastructureIN · YourStory
- PSA Singapore Showcases Future Port TechnologiesSG · The Maritime Executive
- CAAS and ST Aerospace collaborate to test beyond visual line of sight drone operations in SingaporeSG · Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS)
- First in Indonesia, ITS Launches Air Emission Detection DroneID · Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember(ITS)
- Pelindo subholding launches drone safety patrol systemID · Rakyat Merdeka(RM.id)
- Hutchison Ports Quay and Automated Stacking Cranes InspectionsAU · WGA
- BHP trials drones for port operationsAU · Australasian Mine Safety Journal
Check the evidence
Rules, figures and cases cite the sources below. Future scenarios and design proposals are the editors’ own view.
- MLIT Ports and Harbours Bureau: Analysis of deterioration rates in inspection records (Document 4)MLIT Ports and Harbours Bureau · Full text read
- Port and Airport Research Institute (PARI)National Institute of Maritime, Port and Aviation Technology · Full text read
- PIANC: The World Association for Waterborne Transport InfrastructurePIANC · Full text read
Sources checked: 2026-10-22