Airffic InspectionThe future guide to drone inspection

CASE C23 · US · 2018

NJDOT: cost comparison of drone inspection for 244 high-mast light poles at highway interchanges

In 2018 NJDOT compared the cost of drone inspection for 244 high-mast light poles at highway interchanges. Drones were far cheaper than bucket-truck inspection of every pole, but their direct cost was higher than the current ground-based method. They came out slightly ahead only after avoided lane closures were given a monetary value.

OwnerNew Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT)
ProviderCambridge Systematics (research contractor)
LocationNew Jersey, United States
AircraftUAS (model not named)
SensorsHD video, 20 MP stills

Before

Two engineers inspect from the ground with binoculars; about 10% of poles get a bucket-truck follow-up, sometimes needing shoulder/lane closures. Historically every pole was inspected by bucket truck.

With drones

A pilot plus two engineers image each pole by drone, with close stills of suspected defects; base, anchor bolts and luminaires are still checked by other means.

Outcomes

MetricValueBasis
labour-hours per cycleUAS 1,476 vs traditional 1,264–1,552 vs bucket truck (all poles) 3,312Estimate
direct cost per cycleUAS $186,025 vs traditional $167,600–177,667 vs bucket truck $477,022Estimate
total cost incl. safety and efficiencyUAS $186,025 vs traditional $190,988–201,055Estimate
Caveats & limits
  • On direct cost the drone was more expensive than the ground-based traditional method; it came out ahead only after monetising avoided closures and follow-up trips.
  • Six of 244 poles could not be flown (ground cover, airspace, or need to cross live traffic, which NJDOT does not allow).
  • Savings depend on an assumed 10% defect rate; the report's efficiency figure is internally inconsistent ($1,736 vs $1,666 per pole).
  • Desk-based cost model from a research study, not a multi-year operational record.

Sources

Sources checked: 2026-10-22