ASSET / PIPING
Plant piping inspection: finding corrosion on top of pipe racks and under supports
A plant’s piping can add up to tens of kilometres. Deterioration starts where pipes rest on supports, under insulation and on the top tier of the rack. This guide separates what drones can take over from scaffolds and aerial lifts, and what they cannot.
On this page
Where plant piping starts to deteriorate
Piping deterioration falls into external corrosion (coating breakdown, corrosion at supports, corrosion under insulation (CUI)), internal wall loss (erosion, corrosive fluids) and mechanical damage (vibration fatigue, cracked small-bore branches, shifted or bent supports). The difficulty is that only part of the outside can be seen.
| Element | Typical defects | If missed |
|---|---|---|
| Pipe-to-support contact | Crevice corrosion, coating worn by rubbing | Local wall loss on supports, leaks |
| Insulation & cladding | Torn cladding, open seams, water ingress | Corrosion grows unseen under insulation (CUI) |
| Flanges & bolts | Corroded bolts, weeping gaskets | Leaks; bolts too wasted to re-torque |
| Small-bore branches & instrument lines | Vibration fatigue cracks | Sudden fracture and release |
| Pipe supports & spring hangers | Displacement, deformation, wrong spring settings | Overstressed piping, sagging, cracking |
| Pipe rack steel | Corrosion, spalled fireproofing, loose bolts | Weakening of the rack itself |
Today’s inspection and its pain points
In Japan, piping carrying high-pressure gas or hazardous materials is subject to periodic inspection under the High Pressure Gas Safety Act and the Fire Service Act. On top of visual checks, the basic method is repeated ultrasonic thickness measurement at fixed points, estimating remaining life from the rate of wall loss.
The pain is volume and height. Piping runs are long, racks are stacked several tiers high and the upper tiers are metres above ground. Every measurement point needs scaffolding or an aerial lift, and insulated lines must be stripped, measured and reinsulated. Piping scaffolds and insulation work can take up much of a turnaround schedule.
| Method | Strength | Pain point |
|---|---|---|
| Ground-level visual (binoculars) | Fast and cheap | Cannot see upper tiers or the tops of supports |
| Close visual from scaffolds or lifts | Hands-on confirmation | Erection cost and days; limited set-up space |
| Ultrasonic thickness at fixed points | Records wall thickness as numbers | Needs access to every point; misses loss between points |
| Insulation removal | Direct check for CUI | Strip-and-reinstate cost; handling old asbestos-containing insulation |
| Guided waves, radiography, other NDT | Screens long runs through insulation | Specialist staff and equipment; accuracy varies by location |
The other pain is choosing where to look. Measuring everything equally is impossible, so you pick high-risk locations (risk-based inspection, RBI). But the *overall external picture* needed to check whether that selection is right has always been hard to get.
What drones change
The first job for drones on piping is looking along the rack tops and around supports from end to end. With a full external picture, you can narrow down where to bring the gauges. Drones that press an ultrasonic thickness probe against the pipe have also appeared.
| Approach | Typical aircraft & sensors | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Upper-tier exterior imaging | General-purpose drone with zoom and visual cameras (e.g. DJI Matrice class) | Coatings, cladding, flanges, support condition |
| Close-range imaging inside the rack | Caged drones (e.g. Flyability Elios 3) | Congested pipework, between lower tiers |
| Thermography | Radiometric thermal camera | Clues to wet or missing insulation, failed steam traps |
| Gas visualisation | Optical gas imaging (OGI) camera | Leak search at flanges and valves |
| Contact thickness measurement | Drones that place an ultrasonic probe on the pipe (e.g. Skygauge, Voliro, Elios 3 UT payload) | Wall thickness at elevated points (entering practical use) |
| 3D & point clouds | LiDAR or photogrammetry | As-built records, support displacement and sagging |
The basic pattern is a route parallel to the rack. Image the top tier from above and look up at supports from an angle below, capturing each pipe from several directions. Pipes are round: from one direction you see only half.
Overcoming the environment
A pipe rack is a jungle gym of structural steel and pipe: tight, GNSS-weak, compass-confusing, possibly flammable, and threaded with hot lines. For a drone, tightness and hazard arrive together.
- Confined spaces: gaps between pipes are narrow, and thin instrument lines and cables are hard for obstacle sensors to see. Use caged aircraft and make zooming from outside the rack the default. Confined spaces
- GNSS-denied: under racks and between buildings GNSS is weak. Choose aircraft that localise visually or with LiDAR. GNSS-denied environments
- Magnetic disturbance: surrounded by steel pipe and frames, the compass lies. Take off away from steel and be ready to fly without magnetic heading. Magnetic disturbance
- Explosive atmospheres: areas around live piping are often classified hazardous zones. Off-the-shelf drones are not explosion-proof, so image from outside the zone or approach only when gas-free is confirmed. Explosive atmospheres
- Heat: steam lines and hot process lines warm the aircraft as it approaches, and hot pipes reflect into thermal images. Heat
From images to decisions
Piping photos all look alike. Unless each image is tied to which line, which pipe and which location, it is useless. Link images to piping drawings (P&IDs and isometrics) or point clouds and to the thickness measurement register. Only then can they inform where to measure.
| Step | What machines do | What people own |
|---|---|---|
| Detection | Propose rust, coating damage, torn cladding from images | Check misses and false alarms |
| Localisation | Place images on point clouds or drawings, linked to line and support numbers | Resolve mismatches between drawings and the field |
| Measurement | Corroded area, temperature distribution, wall thickness (contact drones) | Confirm conditions, calibration and surface preparation |
| Change detection | Differences from previous images and thickness data | Assess corrosion rate and remaining life |
| Decision | — | Further NDT, repair, replacement and operating limits; sign statutory records |
Piping inspection has always measured at points. Drone imagery fills the gaps between those points with coverage. Find suspects from area-wide imagery, then re-select the points to measure — once that loop runs, the RBI plan gets smarter every year.
Rules and responsibility
In Japan, high-pressure gas piping is subject to safety inspection and periodic self-inspection under the High Pressure Gas Safety Act, and hazardous-materials piping to inspection under the Fire Service Act. For drone use inside plants, the guidelines for safe drone operation in plants issued by METI, the Fire and Disaster Management Agency and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare are the reference. How drone imagery or readings count toward statutory inspection must be confirmed with the relevant authority for each inspection type.
Abroad, in-service piping inspection widely follows the American Petroleum Institute’s API 570 piping inspection code and the practices in API 574. API 570 sorts piping into classes with maximum intervals for thickness measurement and external visual inspection (five years for both in Class 1), and gives specific attention to CUI. In the US, OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) requires mechanical integrity inspection.
Flight rules apply separately. Outdoor pipe racks fall under aviation law, and flights within 30 m of property need permission or approval. Compare countries in world regulations.
What drones cannot do
- Under insulation and internal wall loss: photos show only the cladding surface. Thermal images are clues; thickness must be measured with ultrasonics or other gauges.
- The support contact face: where a pipe rests on a support is invisible from any angle. It needs lifting or dedicated inspection methods.
- Contact readings at every point: contact drones cannot reach some points, depending on pipe orientation and congestion.
- Close flight in live hazardous areas: never fly an ordinary drone where flammable gas may be present.
- Rating and accountability: judging remaining life and timing replacement remains a human job.
2035: the world where inspection works
At the end of the factory’s pipe rack sits a drone box. Once a month the drone flies along the rack, images each pipe from the same pose as last time and presses a thickness probe against the pipe wherever something looks wrong. Results land automatically on a 3D model of the piping, and only the fast-thinning spots change colour on the engineer’s screen. That is the picture our editors expect.
Nobody needs to scaffold the rack and walk it. People work out why pipes are thinning, revisit operating conditions and materials, and set replacement order. Inspection shifts from walking pipe by pipe to caring for the whole life of the piping.
PREPARATION
Pre-flight preparation checklist
Ticks are saved on this device (and to your shared account if signed in). This is a learning aid, not proof of permission or safety.
Cases for this asset
- Turner Specialty Services: drone inspection of 600 m of elevated pipe racksNot stated
- Shell: tethered UT drone inspections of offshore piping and vessels by retrained rope-access techniciansUS Gulf of Mexico (e.g. Olympus platform, about 130 miles south of New Orleans)
Related papers
- Autonomous Navigation and Mapping for Inspection of Penstocks and Tunnels With MAVsÖzaslan, T. 2017
- Aerial Manipulation: A Literature ReviewRuggiero, F. 2018
- Past, Present, and Future of Aerial Robotic ManipulatorsOllero, A. 2022
- A Truly-Redundant Aerial Manipulator System With Application to Push-and-Slide Inspection in Industrial PlantsTognon, M. 2019
Country sources(19)
- Considerations on replacing visual inspection with drones in plant safetyJP · 経済産業省・消防庁(総務省サイト掲載)
- China's home-developed explosion-proof inspection drone for hazardous chemicals makes first flightCN · 新华社
- IG Drones secures NTPC Darlipali pipeline contract, inaugurated by PM ModiIN · TimesTech
- Fully automated drones to conduct inspection on Jurong IslandSG · A*STAR(The Straits Times 記事の転載)
- UAS Demonstration and Development for Inaccessible Features Inspections (Reclamation project 20096)US · U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
- Drone thermography method to detect false air entry in gas ducts between a boiler and an electrostatic precipitatorBR · Blucher Engineering Proceedings(V Simpósio Internacional de Inovação e Tecnologia, SIINTEC)
- Drones improve inspection results at Argentina's oil and gas refineriesAR · DJI Enterprise
- Drones: allies for maintenance at TerniumAR · Ternium Argentina
- Drones put into use at Sellafield siteGB · World Nuclear News
- Water company hails new innovative tool as dam goodGB · Northumbrian Water Group
- Rise Of The DronesGB · INEOS (Inch magazine, issue 7)
- Chemiepark Knapsack uses industrial drones for more safety and efficiencyDE · CHEManager
Check the evidence
Rules, figures and cases cite the sources below. Future scenarios and design proposals are the editors’ own view.
- FDMA: Revision of the Guidelines for the Safe Operation of Drones in Plants (March 2020)FDMA, for the three-ministry liaison conference (FDMA, MHLW, METI) · Full text read
- METI / FDMA: Can drones substitute for visual inspection in plant safety?METI / Fire and Disaster Management Agency · Full text read
- API 510, 570 and 653 inspection intervals (API 570 piping classes and CUI)Reliable (explainer on American Petroleum Institute codes) · Full text read
- 29 CFR 1910.119: Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals (OSHA)U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (via Cornell LII) · Full text read
- MLIT: No-fly airspace and flight methods for unmanned aircraftMLIT Civil Aviation Bureau · Full text read
Sources checked: 2026-10-22